We started OK Do a little over a year ago to have a home for independent thinking and doing. Designers by background, we wanted to use our skills and methods in work that avoids traditional categories and disciplinary boundaries. The idea of stepping beyond the realm of design – to the borderlands of art and science – was the starting point of the Science Poems project, too. Natural science felt particularly fascinating for us as it deals with things physically present in our everyday lives yet often beyond our abilities to sense or conceptualise. Seeing design and art as good tools for asking questions and visualising the invisible, we set out to explore the field of natural science in a very subjective way, trying to understand it as well as find cross-disciplinary ways to talk about it.

A book and exhibition on the topic were launched in June 2010 at 0fr galerie in Paris, where we invited six designer and artist friends to present their ‘science poems’. Ranging from fashion exploring electromagnetic space to a musical composition derived from DNA base pairs, each exhibition piece dealt with a particular field of natural science: astronomy, biology, chemistry, earth sciences, physics or cross-disciplines. The book features presentations of the works in the exhibition, discussions with some of our favourite science poets, articles about subjects such as parallel universes or spiritual science as well as various other experimental science writings and images. Edited by us, it is designed by Åh, the London-based studio we have worked in close collaboration with since the beginning of our existence. Other contributors include friends with wild ideas about science.

Science Poems London presentation at Donlon Books / X Marks the Bökship.

After Paris, the Science Poems book travelled around the world together with small-scale displays. Coming from Napa Books in Helsinki and do you read me?! in Berlin, its last presentation was held in London at Donlon Books / X Marks the Bökship with a reading of ‘From Big Bang Machine (with love)’ science fiction short story by author Maria Candia. The story by the Helsinki-based novelist (also known as Megatron Braineater) presented the genesis of a man-made universe written for the book, while we served the guests a mixture of ammonium chloride, ethanol and water wearing chemist coats specially created for the drink lab by fashion designer K.I. Kinnunen. Made out of space blankets, the costumes reflected Kinnunen’s Science Poems exhibition piece, Faraday Suit, bridging techno-romanticism and retreat and exploring clothes as not only physical but also philosophical interfaces between the internal and external worlds.

Space blanket chemist coats by K.I. Kinnunen.

“Science Poems is a project that will never end.”

Science Poems is a project that will never end. Having taken part in the topical discourse around merging disciplines through artistic excursions to the field of natural science, playing with human perceptions of reality, in the future we would like to join our forces with scientists in practice. We will continue the discussion about science with a mathematician and a Waldorf psychologist at the Applied Freedom symposium and exhibition by the Stuttgart State Academy of Art and Design on 26 January, 2011. More information to follow.

Science Poems London presentation at Donlon Books / X Marks the Bökship.

Hello Ingo.

It all started in 2006 with Solutions 1-10: Umbauland (“Remodel Nation”), ten provokingly simple ideas which would see Germany work it out after all, including a new grammar, a new political party, and the Great Pyramid, the biggest building in the world which would serve as a democratic tomb for millions of people. At the moment, there are already five Solution books, and more to come.

How would you describe the series and its overall premise? Why the nation?

Because the nation is so weak. Basically, in the Solution series authors are asked to develop an abundance of compact and original ideas for countries and regions, contradicting the widely held assumption that, after the end of socialism, human advancement is only possible through technology or requires a yet-to-be-established world order.

“The Solution series contradicts the widely held assumption that human advancement is only possible through technology or requires a yet-to-be-established world order.”

Is authorship relevant to you in regards to the visions of Umbauland and Dubai Democracy?

I’m happy with just having the ideas, but they should have the potential to work. The books are like seeds. It’s more up to others to put them into the soil. And just as actual seeds, they can remain seeds for quite a while.

You’re not interested in personally pursuing their realisation through, for instance, political means?

I had the idea to take one of the ten visions in Umbauland, the first Solution book on Germany, and try to promote it myself. I chose The Great Pyramid – the idea of a mass tomb for potentially everyone – and did the project mainly in collaboration with an entrepreneur, Jens Thiel. We organised an architectural competition, produced a business plan, collaborated with an engineer who thought about how it could be realised, founded an association to support it, and got everything documented on film. We got immense media attention and caused a big debate in Germany, but it was difficult to take the next step. However, the project still exists.

In general, the more real the visions become the better. But my capacities are limited. I want to continue writing. How it usually works when proposing a vision for a country is that you become the face of the vision, having one key vision and sticking to it – promoting it for years and years. But this is boring for me.

Solution 186–195: Dubai Democracy by Ingo Niermann.

‘Strategic design’ and ‘design thinking’ have become buzzwords not only in business and industry but also on a governmental level. How would you place the Solution series on this map, and where do you think strategic design (or the Solution series) ends and politics begin?

‘Solution’ is a very common term in economics and there’s no problem with strategic design. But why not do these things completely independently? When you’re not necessarily dependent on the realisation of your ideas, it’s possible to choose a completely different rhetoric, a completely different language. Momus, for instance, wrote short stories on Scotland [see Jenna's interview with Momus]. And his forthcoming Japan book will be like a novel. Tirdad Zolghadr’s book about America is largely an autobiography.

Who are the authors of the books in addition to the ones on Germany and Dubai, which you wrote yourself?

They’re either friends or people who actually approached me. Momus got involved in The Great Pyramid project by performing at The Great Pyramid gala. He asked me if he could contribute, and I immediately said yes. I mean, I wouldn’t have dared to ask him myself.

What would you say is the role and meaning of being inside and looking out vs. outside and looking in in terms of writing about your own home country or other nations like China or Dubai in your case? Or maybe Scotland and Japan in Momus’ case.

Actually it doesn’t feel that much different – doing a book on Germany or one on Dubai. We had these discussions with one of the contributors, Tirdad Zolghadr, because a friend of mine wanted to do a book on Afghanistan and we wondered whether it would be neo-colonial if she as a German did that. But I think there should be no restrictions. Everything works. I mean, Momus did a book on Scotland. He is from Scotland, but almost never lived there. Still, there is a connection. Tirdad was also born in the US, but didn’t live there so long, except now when he returned to teach there. His approach was more about looking at the biggest, the still most powerful country in the world.

Ingo Niermann at home in Wedding, Berlin.

Going back to the question of genre. Is the boundary between fiction and non-fiction interesting or relevant to you?

I’m a novelist, although most of the books that I publish are non-fiction. But the possibilities of making things up or not making things up interest me. When you talk about the future, you don’t know where the boundary is. That’s a nice thing. Usually novelists write about things in the past. Or they write science fiction. However, my idea as a novelist creating the Solution series is that when you talk about the future it’s fiction per se.

“When you talk about the future, you don’t know where the boundary between fiction and non-fiction is.”

And how has your work with the Solution series been received? Has it been perceived as “real”?

There has been a lot of questioning in relation to my work. For instance, we went to a village which we had chosen as a possible place to build The Great Pyramid. Some people thought it was “Borat”. We were also given some funding for the project by the German Cultural Foundation, but they wanted us to ensure that we didn’t actually want the pyramid to become real. They liked the idea of keeping the piece in the framework of fiction and culture as they are not allowed to support real-estate ventures.

Which nations are next on the list?

There will be a book on Japan, The Book of Japans by Momus. Starting again from Scotland, on Shetland Islands, there’s a group of people who claim that they travelled to the future of Japan. They are twelve people, and they are called The Idiots. Now experts have to judge whether their prophecies on the future of Japan are realistic.

Then there’s another one, The United States of Palestine-Israel. It’s an anthology with 19 solutions written by many contributors and edited by Joshua Simon. It’s really interesting because the term ‘solution’ is very familiar in the context of Palestine and Israel. People always talk about the two-state solution, but it’s actually a guarantor of stagnation. And the book is all about opening up that discourse. It’s about questioning that solution and offering an abundance of new ones from creating a multitude of states to that one and only, coming up with a common myth for both Israelis and Palestinians. Some solutions evolve out of art projects and some from the perspective of politicians.

What else are you working at the moment?

At the moment, I’m working on a long essay titled Drill, which will include elements of fiction. It’s as much about my personal poetology, a way of understanding what I did so far and what keeps it together, as it is about the fundamental practice of contemporary people in general. It’s something that already happens, but I’m projecting it into the future. The Solution series is part of it, you’re part of it. I try not to do any less than understand the post post modern state – something that people do, but they just don’t know it yet. There’s all this opening up and crossing boundaries when you think of the last decades. And Drill could be the next step. It’s about limitations that you give yourself. It’s the freedom to restrict yourself. Radical performance art from the 70s has been of great inspiration to me when thinking about the Drill. In reverse, my concept of a Drill Palace inspired the performance artist Marina Abramović to “drill” her live audience.

Better Dreams, edited by Martti Kalliala and co-written with Jenna Sutela and Tuomas Toivonen will be published by Sternberg Press in 2011.

- Better Dreams book project by Martti Kalliala, Jenna and Tuomas Toivonen
- Anni’s Master’s thesis about OK Do
- OK Talk book: design dialogues between Helsinki and London
- Science Poems London
- Supporting the champions in Punavuori, Helsinki through events with Kokoro & Moi
- A Stockholm event with Bygg
- Mr. Children
- Thinking about what OK Do will be in 2011

André Breton, an autoportrait (ca. 1929) | Still image from Alphaville by Jean Luc Godard, 1965

AM: Firstly, I would like to ask how you came up with the idea to curate an exhibition that deals with natural sciences in relation to art and design and vice versa? What kind of inspirations and motivations are behind the exhibition?

JS: We’ve both been operating somewhere in the borderlands of design, touching on both art and science in our work. For instance, interaction and communications design, information visualisation or design research all call for transdisciplinary interest. We’re curious about exploring different systems and theories, and things like electromagnetics, or the brain – a bigger picture beyond one discipline. I think that design or art, for us, is about trying to develop strategies of understanding and showing. A lot like science. And it’s interesting to mix the different ways of looking at things, the ways of an artist and a scientist. Like André Breton [a surrealist theorist] said: “To change ways of being, one has to first change ways of seeing.” Or, we could also look at seeing from a Steinerian perspective and say that just like the eye perceives colours and the ear sounds, so thinking perceives ideas. Rudolf Steiner considered this to be the premise upon which Goethe made his natural-scientific observations – looking at ideas as “objects of experience” and thinking as an organ of perception. I think we need design, art and science, and both the real and the imaginary, in the same stream of thought to understand the world better.

“We need design, art and science, and both the real and the imaginary, in the same stream of thought to understand the world better.”

AP: We think that the theme of mixing science with visual disciplines is definitely in the air right now and one of the reasons for this could be that you don’t need to be a scientist to have access to a profusion of information nowadays – as well as to tools to handle it. Different professionals are also very open for co-operation these days: it’s an adventure to jump outside your own field. The idea of Science Poems was very much inspired by existing design and art that deals with the topic of natural sciences. In addition to the contemporary examples, like designer and professor duo Anthony Dunne & Fiona Raby and Marc-Olivier Wahler, the director of Palais de Tokyo – whom we’ve interviewed for the Science Poems book – we have many idols who have operated in the borderlands of design, art and science in the past. Having previously discussed the topic with Jenna, I got really into it after seeing Alphaville, a 1965 film by Jean-Luc Godard . Like Alphaville, in James Monaco’s words, “prefers to see the poetry of science rather than its mathematical logic”, we also wish to dig into the lyrical and visual sphere of science, making subjective interpretations and questions about it.

AM: Talking about the big picture and interdisciplinary thinking, Jenna, I remember that your MA thesis at the University of Art and Design Helsinki was inspired by the Whole Earth Catalog, a counterculture publication from the 60s and 70s. Stewart Brand’s catalogue aimed to give people the tools to better understand the world through different ways of affecting one’s environment. Has it had an effect on Science Poems, too?

JS: The Whole Earth Catalog has been inspirational to me when it comes to understanding what and how to design. It presents a lot of narratives of design in everyday life and provides means for the readers to find their own inspiration, shape their own environment and share their experience with whoever is interested. In practice, the catalogue contains information on different means for making things, listing artefacts from special-purpose utensils to informative books and courses, as well as early synthesisers and personal computers. So, instead of showing the end results – ready-made objects or products, like catalogues often do – it rather presents tools to spark ideas. Like my former boss at Arki research group would say, Brand’s catalogue is a classic example of “design for designability”. As a matter of fact, the Whole Earth Catalog has been described as a conceptual forerunner of web search engines. It blurs the boundaries of expertise and everyday, bringing information about different fields of activity closer to people of various disciplines. And this is what the Science Poems project aims to do, too – to function as a common point of reference (a boundary object) for interdisciplinary conversations about natural sciences, in this case.

Stewart Brand's Whole Earth Catalog, 1968 | A Wikipedia Reader by Mylinh Trieu and David Horvitz (eds.), 2008

AM: Being a graphic designer, I have noticed a tendency towards interdisciplinary thinking also in my own field. Glossaries creating connections between subjects from different sources have been a widely used approach in editing content to inspire people to look at things from a different perspective and to question certain “truths” or divisions into rigid categories. I assume that this linking of things partly derives from online practices, and using Wikipedia in particular. A publication called A Wikipedia Reader, edited by Mylinh Trieu Nguyen and David Horvitz, deals with this phenomenon by linking topics from different fields and hierarchy levels together. Wikipedia links subjects to each other in a way that breaks down certain traditional divisions and hierarchies – subjects with typically different value levels might appear on the same level… The ways to present information surely affect on how we perceive and use it. Operating mainly online, have you been thinking about these kinds of things now that you’re presenting something offline?

JS: Yes, the question about perceiving information and different value levels online, where everything is miscellaneous, is really interesting. There’s a risk that some bits of important information go unnoticed and, in time, vanish in the process of searching, copying and pasting. Or their original meaning might change when they travel through different contexts. For example, when someone googles ‘cosmology’ and finds our publication, or the stories about Cosmic Wonder art organisation and artist Yayoi Kusama, uninformed about the field of science, could they consider cosmology an art movement and write about it on their blog? The life of information is, definitely, one of the things we’ve considered during the Science Poems process – also from the point of view of us learning about natural sciences online. Another interesting issue to think about is the change of context from the online environment to a gallery space with limited access to Wikipedia, Google and other tools for interpretation. In the physical exhibition, we, together with the artists, can decide what kind of information to display next to each piece of work – and what to leave out. And making this publication, for us, is about linking the exhibition to a wider frame of reference and extending the show beyond the gallery. Umberto Eco recently used the expressions ‘the poetics of everything included’ and the ‘poetics of the etcetera’ when talking about lists, and I think we can easily say that Science Poems falls into the latter category. Our idea is to continue exploring the topic after the exhibition, too.

AM: Extending a show outside the gallery reminds me of Exhibition Prosthetics, a recent publication by Joseph Grigely which deals with the relationship of an exhibition and its catalogue. It argues that a catalogue can, in fact, be seen as part of the exhibition – instead of a mere extension.

JS: Last December, I met with artist Simon Starling who had done some research on the relationship between an exhibition and its catalogue for the MAC/VAL exhibition Thereherethenthere. He drew a parallel between putting up an exhibition and producing an exhibition catalogue, seeing the two activities equally important and integrally linked. He stated that books often carry research material, a sense of time and place, and/or a network of connectivity into the presentation of a work. He also said that in some instances the exhibition itself serves as an intermediary editorial process in the production of a book. I think this was a particularly interesting thought, and one that could be applied to the making of the Science Poems publication as well.

“We use both the print and web publication as symbiotic companions of the exhibition.”

AP: In our case, we use both the print and web publication as symbiotic companions of the exhibition. The website is a great tool for, as we suggested earlier, providing the audience with convenient access to the links related to the Science Poems project. We hope that people will come to see the exhibition because they read about it at www.ok-do.eu, and that they will go back to the website and read the book after seeing the exhibition, in order to go deeper.

Exhibition Prosthetics by Joseph Grigely, edited by Zak Kyes, Bedford Press 2010 | www.ok-do.eu

AM: Simon Starling’s work is indeed an intriguing example of looking at ways to open up processes behind art and design. His project brings to my mind a show, Archiving the Catalogue, that recently took place in Berlin. In fact, it was an open project space by artists Nicolas Y Galeazzi and Joël Verwimp. They had put up an experimental editing-laboratorium where the process of editing a publication was physically on display – exhibited as an ongoing and evolving work. This reminded me of the fact that editing is all about choices, and that there is in a sense no definitive truth.

JS: I remember there was a similar performance by Dexter Sinister at Proforma last autumn, where they organised a team to write, edit, print and distribute a newspaper twice a week during the event. The project was partly about how the news creates what we believe is true, yet its main idea was to show that the activity of editing a newspaper is as much about process as it is about product. And this is totally the case in our work with Science Poems, and the fact that it is our first publication makes the process even more interesting. There are so many things to consider and learn about: management, tone of voice, working with other writers, editing our own text, copyrights, physics, biology, astronomy. Equally, when making a publication out of personal interest, with no external guides or restrictions (other than not being able to afford more than 144 pages and having to get it ready for the exhibition in June) many things are based on our intuition. The book reflects the interests of Anni and myself, and is the sum of all the people involved.

AM: Are you interested in exhibiting the artworks connected to the scientific context where they derive from, or do you rather want to keep the connection more ambiguous, poetic? I was recently working for Extra-City, a Belgian museum arranging an exhibition dealing with Animism, an idea according to which animals, plants, rocks and so on have a soul.

The curators looked at the term from a contemporary point of view in order to question the dichotomies that modernism had associated with it. Glossaries with historical references presented next to the art works directed the visitor’s perception to a certain mindset but the curation still left space for different interpretations of the works. How did you find a balance between opening up the backgrounds of the works and leaving certain things open for people to interpret?

AP: The Science Poems exhibition aims to present artists’ and designers’ ideas about natural sciences. Some of them, like Miska Knapek, use scientific data very strictly in the actual production of the piece, whereas others have taken scientific ideas and made their own interpretation of them, like Anna Ahonen and Katariina Lamberg. I guess the main principle of the exhibition is that it’s acceptable and justifiable to interpret, explore and discuss science with artistic tools and intuition. Our chat with Tomi Kokkonen, a philosopher of science (the interview is also included in the book) made us feel a whole lot more comfortable about it. With him we discussed how art could be used to bring new aspects of science and its subject matters within the reach of different kinds of people; by offering alternative perspectives to it and its relation to everyday reality.

“Some of the artists and designers in the Science Poems exhibition use scientific data very strictly in the actual production of the piece, whereas others have taken scientific ideas and made their own interpretation of them.”

The book contains additional information on the exhibition and the pieces as well as ideas OK Do has about science at the moment. I don’t think we believe casting light on the background of a work of art or an exhibition would create barriers to interpretation. Therefore, we interviewed all the artists and asked them to tell us where they are coming from with their work. In that sense, we are very much designers as well – instead of keeping the backgrounds and messages a mystery we like to dig them out and show them to the rest of the world. And when dealing with visual language, there will always be space for interpretation no matter how much you talk about it.

Dexter Sinister's The First/Last Newspaper, 2009 | Étienne-Jules Marey: Buse volant avec l’appareil qui signale les mouvements décrits par l’extrémité de son aile, 1873

AM: Anni, you mentioned that you have been inspired by existing design and art that finds itself on the borderlines of design, art, and science. Could you give an example of this and how it changed your thinking, especially in relation to Science Poems?

AP: One moment of revelation for me was when I first discovered the thinking of Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. To be honest, at the university, I had been pretty much educated to find solutions for other people’s problems. Dunne and Raby turn things around by saying that designers should find problems instead of solving them. This kind of design attitude connects with art that practices social criticism, and since scientific development affects our society, art and design, they all go hand in hand. Dunne and Raby have written a book called Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. It’s a good example of a project which explores all of these disciplines at once.

AM: It would definitely be a shame if the abilities of designers were used only for commercial needs. Asking questions through design is something that I learned when studying in the Netherlands. There is a lot to learn from Dutch designers’ abilities to tackle social issues!

 How did you come up with curating an exhibition instead of, for example, writing articles or conducting interviews around the topic of Science Poems? What kinds of insights do you think that an exhibition as a means of distributing content can bring about?

JS: We think organising events like exhibitions or talks establishes a nice dialogue with writing about things. We like to learn by doing, documenting, and building something new on top of it. Sometimes, we also like to come out of our medium and meet people offline (haha), and exhibitions are great places to do that. The works of art on display stimulate discussion.

“We like to learn by doing, documenting, and building something new on top of it.”

While the digital world rearranges itself for each person and their current task, a physical exhibition is presented to everyone in the same way, through someone else’s lense, under a predefined topic. Of course, the interpretations may vary and people pick up things according to their own interests, but the starting point is the same – and it includes an element of surprise. The experience is also tied to a certain time and place, which makes it unique. Exhibitions can bring about interesting reactions and encounters.

Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects by Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby, Birkhäuser 2001 | Logo of the natural history museum of Paris

AM: How did you end up locating the exhibition in Paris?

AP: Paris was chosen because this year it has become one of our favourite places on earth. There are many reasons for that: Jenna was there for an artist residency, I fell for a French guy, we saw inspiring movies like those of Jean-Luc Godard and were also inspired by the aesthetics of science in France. I think our fascination is based on the poetic nature of French aesthetics and how it reflects classical ideas and history in which all new knowledge finds its roots. The graphic design of the Science Poems book has also drawn inspiration from that, as Åh, the designers of this book, also share our fascination.

Spread from an old French science book | Deyrolle magazine, 46 rue du Bac, Paris

AM: I noticed that most of the works in the exhibition are created by designers. Was it a conscious choice from you? And is this perhaps related to your interdiscplinary thinking – that it is not necessary to separate art and design that strongly from each other?

AP: It’s all about friends! We chose the exhibitors by intuition and the decisions took place very naturally, based on the pool of talented people we are so lucky to have around us. We are designers by training and have actually met many of the people more or less through our university. Having said that, we also believe in messing about with categories, roles and definitions – we think that renaissance spirit is good for both individual people and the whole world. Many people have multiple talents and interests and it’s interesting to take these to unusual contexts and see what happens.

Art vs. design is a topic that we’re generally very much into, perhaps because we are keen on doing art in a designer way and vice versa. We’ve had some good discussions about the topic with, for example, Paola Antonelli (article to be published soon). Right now, our aim is to explore this issue by doing and experimenting, and the Science Poems exhibition is one the first steps. The main thing for us, whether it’s about a commissioned or an independent project, is to mix analytical investigation with intuitivity and self-expression with social and critical activity.

JS: We like to think of art instructing design through presenting wild ideas that might seem utopian to begin with but, at their best, can lead into cultural production of new forms of practice. Dunne and Raby call it critical design. The interesting thing about art is that it enables displaying experimental artefacts to audiences without the need to put effort into production or marketing. Art materialises fantasies that keep on developing over time within the artworld – and outside it in various different hands and minds – never striving for definitive products so common to the design field. Like Duchamp said, “art is a game among all men of all eras”, and we take part in it with some Science Poems.

It's Momus.

The Book of Scotlands begins with the statement: “Every lie creates a parallel world. The world in which it is true.” Does this idea refer to using fiction as a means to tell the truth or is it more about the importance of imagining alternatives, not settling for something that’s already there?

First of all, it describes a certain approach. One of my working methods over the years has been to pose as a bastard while doing virtuous things. For instance, I was over-educated for pop music. While actually being a moralistic Calvinist, I pretended to be a sinner just because it made the songs more interesting for everybody. In writing, the same manner appears in a milder form – I pretend to be a liar. By proposing that everything in The Book of Scotlands is a lie, I can tell various truths in an oblique way. To explain this a bit further, I use two strategies in writing. One of them is the Rorschach where I’m treating Scotland as a random blot of ink, playing with its different perceptions. Another one is the Japanese technique called Ma, or negative space, which is based on the idea of making a composition out of not objects themselves but the space between the objects. I write about everything except Scotland. And by looking at everything that’s not Scotland, I’m hoping to discover the true essence of the country. It’s like a child with a colouring book – instead of colouring the map of Scotland you colour the sea around it and finally Scotland appears as a blank space. I like to call it dancing around the subject.

“By looking at everything that’s not Scotland, I’m hoping to discover the true essence of the country.”

In the spirit of these working techniques, your book includes many visual and symbolic ideas. I particularly enjoy this one, Scotland number seventy-eight: “The Scotland in which all maps of the country are displayed upside-down and back-to-front to make everything fresh.” You also touch the future in e.g. Scotland fifteen: “The tremendously powerful Scotland which nanotechnology has made, by and large, too small to see.” In my view, your work with the book is very close to design. How do you feel about this interpretation?

As a matter of fact I was rather influenced by a design group called REDESIGNDEUTCHLAND. Ingo Niermann, the editor who commissioned The Book of Scotlands was actually part of this group. He had previously written Umbauland, a book on ten ideas for a better Germany applying design principles to the nation itself. Although generally considered more a writer than a designer, he managed to come up with a plan including a new grammar, a new political party as well as a system of assigning allotment gardens to unemployed people and retirees. So yes, I guess you might as well call my book Redesign Scotland. I find design interesting because it can be very utopian. Yet, when talking about design, people often pay attention to change more than continuity. And I think it’s very important to think about continuity.

Scotland as Rorschach. The Book of Scotlands, pp. 80-81.

The book also contains many musical and sonic references – sentences like “They were busy looking at each other with clicking metal eyes.” or stories about a band called Sonic Flower Groove after an album by the Scottish group Primal Scream. Would you say that you experience places through their sonic environment?

Being a musician I obviously have to pay a lot of attention to that. One reason behind the Sonic Flower Groove episode is that the first time I discovered Berlin was when I came here on tour with Primal Scream in 1987. So I was thinking what if it was reversed, that I was actually coming from Berlin and experiencing Scotland in the same way. And I guess that happened with many places, I discovered them as a musician. Music was a way to get my travel expenses paid.

How would you describe Berlin, your current home city by these attributes?

Berlin is a very quiet town. It has made me lose interest in pop music. The main sound on the streets is the birds singing. Germans like to see their cities as extensions of the forest and there are trees everywhere. And that’s very different from e.g. London where there is a lot of pollution and most of the sounds come from traffic or small speakers in every corner in every sandwich bar… And time is money. In that sense, Berlin is much less capitalist, much less toxic. And you can hear it. It’s a very avant-garde, experimental city. Even when you go to concerts you often end up listening to field recordings or the sound of a contact microphone being scraped up and down, sounds of ping pong balls or balloons. All this could be seen as utterly pretentious in many other cities but here you don’t have to have an aim or a commercial purpose in what you do. One can escape all sorts of obligations and necessities. That’s probably one reason why I have stayed here for so long.

Scotland number one hundred and three reads: “A computer makes a Scotland seem almost unnecessary.” Could this thought be applied to all distant places with internet access – like Finland, my home country, which you even refer to in the book (Scotland 136) – or is it rather a comment on a lack of identity?

Well, I think we’re seeing a crisis in national identity. I was quoted in a magazine saying that my true motherland is the internet. I feel like wherever I travel I’m always in this country called the internet. Or maybe it’s the operating system that counts – and I do almost feel a certain patriotism towards Apple computers. However, there’s another part of my identity that’s very Scottish. Whatever that is.

“I feel like wherever I travel I’m always in this country called the internet.”

Furthermore, Scotland number eighty-eight states: “I want Scottish people, rather than tourists, to be the curators of this culture…” Next to the developing “Scottish way of being”, how would you characterize living and working in Berlin?

I guess a Berlin way of being is collaboration between the Berliners and the immigrants – either the Turkish immigrants or the creative immigrants – who all work together to make the city enjoyable. Someone for example built this relaxed patio where we’re sitting here in Prenzlauer Berg. And like Prenzlauer Berg, Berlin obviously has different villages. My particular village is Neukölln where there’s a lot more immigrants than here. I really enjoy the Turkish markets and the exoticism in Neukölln. People are also a bit more economically motivated, though it’s pretty easy to live in Berlin not thinking commercially at all. Compared to Neukölln, Prenzlauer Berg almost feels like a white bourgeois paradise. And that makes me a bit uneasy. I feel a need to rebel against monoculture, yet paradoxically, when I’m in Neukölln I can embody the values of Prenzlauer Berg without feeling like it’s a cliché.

Momus at home in Neukölln, Berlin.

You have lived in major cities around the world. What makes you move, and what made you leave Scotland in the first place?

It’s just a pattern I established very early because of moving with my father’s work when I was a child. After studying in Scotland I left for London to make it in music – a thing that all the Scottish musicians do. London felt like a bigger version of Scotland where more things were possible. Since then, my whole life has been motivated by appetite for certain things in certain cities. I’ve been lucky not having to work and being free to go wherever, even if it has made me very poor sometimes. Tokyo is my favourite city in the whole world. If my books are successful, that’s exactly where I’m going to go next.

How does the change of living environment affect your work?

When I was in Japan I felt quite isolated because I was a foreigner and I couldn’t speak too much Japanese. I found that my Scottish identity was becoming more important there. The album I made in Tokyo even has these rather strange Scottish songs on it. Berlin has brought up the need to experiment with sound because that’s just what people do here. I can spend my mornings at home writing something and the rest of the day is free for discovering something new. Then again London was a very commercial city so I tried to be successful and make lots of money. Living and working abroad makes you realize how only half of your personality is your own to control and the rest is really open to influence. I mean, we’re all chameleons in some way and the environment does change you. There’s a dialectical process going on between the environment and your personality.

“There’s a dialectical process going on between the environment and your personality.”

Your blog, Click Opera blurs the boundaries between work and personal life as well as between different disciplines from design to music and social enquiry. I think it captures the essence of now. Do you have a working philosophy?

The current theme in a lot of my work is Scheherazade, the wife of the king in One Thousand and One Nights. Scheherazade was the only one of the king’s wives who he didn’t kill. And that was because she told stories. Everyday she told him a new story and left it in a very interesting place where she stopped so that he had to keep her alive to hear what happened next. I really like this idea of challenging yourself by pulling something out everyday, telling a story in public to stop people from killing you.